"The fishing Stinks" Cover page of the Portland Press Herald

MouseTrap

Rear Admiral
Joined
Sep 10, 2011
Posts
1,165
Likes
235
Location
Seacoast, NH
Boat Make
Rosborough
In New England, the fishing stinks | The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram

In New England, the fishing stinks

‘We’re limping along’ says a Portland Fish Exchange official as scientists and fishermen struggle to get a handle on the health of Gulf of Maine species.

By Colin Woodard [email protected]
Staff Writer

PORTLAND - It's a weekday morning, and the cavernous refrigerated hall of the Portland Fish Exchange -- the country's oldest wholesale fresh-fish auction -- is at a 10th of capacity.

A dozen vessels -- most of them small boats -- have discharged their catch. There are 100 ice-filled plastic totes of pollock at the back of the hall, and smaller numbers holding cod, hake, sole and other bottom-dwelling "groundfish." Eight swordfish -- silver torpedoes weighing nearly 200 pounds apiece -- have come in on the Safe Haven, a 40-foot boat out of Harpswell.

It's not a bad day, given the state of the Gulf of Maine's fisheries, but all told there are just 25,000 pounds of product on the floor. Bert Jongerden, the exchange's general manager, estimates that the publicly owned facility is on target for 5 million to 6 million pounds in 2012, ahead of the record low of 3.8 million pounds in 2010, but a fraction of the 20 million pounds it took in annually in the 1990s.

"We're limping along, but you can't plan adequately because the science is so speculative," Jongerden said, alluding to the federal fisheries service's recent radical downward revisions of the health of New England's cod populations. "No one has any faith in the science anymore."

"Everyone's trying hard to stay in business," he said of the fishermen who still land their fish in Maine. "They've got so much capital investment in this they can't just bail on it, so they hope the government can get the science straightened out."

Last month, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Fisheries Service released its annual report on the status of the nation's fisheries.

The report, released May 15, indicated that management is working and that fish stocks are, in fact, improving. According to the report, six once-threatened fish populations had been rehabilitated to healthy levels over the previous year, from Bering Sea snow crab to summer flounder on the mid-Atlantic coast.

Over the past 11 years, 27 damaged stocks have been declared rebuilt, leaving just 45 to be restored out of the 219 that the agency tracks.

Unfortunately, 13 of them are in New England, including many of those that once supported Maine's fishing communities.

The Gulf of Maine cod population remains at 58 percent of what managers consider a healthy level. Georges Bank cod is at 12 percent, and the region's Atlantic halibut is at just 3 percent.

When the next report comes out, Gulf of Maine cod and haddock will be added to the list of damaged stocks.

Maine's fishing fleet has dwindled to a shadow of its former self, with lobster boats replacing trawlers, gillnetters and other vessels in many ports. Many groundfishing vessels have moved from Portland to Massachusetts ports to save on fuel and earn extra income landing lobsters that wind up in their nets -- such bycatch may not be sold in Maine.

"The U.S. has among the strongest fishery management regimes in the world, and I very much feel that it's working," said John Sackton, publisher of Seafood.com in Lexington, Mass. "New England is the one area that's problematic. We're the problem child."

One reason is that many of New England's important commercial fish stocks have been exploited for a very long time and were more severely damaged.

"In the Pacific Northwest and Alaska, you have these huge-volume fisheries," said Maggie Mooney-Seus, a Gloucester, Mass.-based spokeswoman for NOAA Fisheries. "We had these things here in New England, too, but it was 300 years ago."

"In New England, we are probably dealing with a marine environment that has been highly disturbed from a fishing standpoint for centuries in regards to groundfish," said Peter Shelley, senior counsel of the Conservation Law Foundation, an organization whose 1991 lawsuit forced the federal government to take measures to stop overfishing and rebuild depleted stocks.

"Cod, haddock and many flounders were hammered close to oblivion, so the starting point for those fish is lower than others."

Robin Alden, a former Maine marine resources commissioner who's now executive director of the Stonington-based Penobscot East Resource Center, said, "The groundfish species ... got to such a low level it's unrealistic to think that because you put catch limits into place, you're going to have a recovery in a couple of years."

Further complicating matters, depleted New England populations such as cod and flounder live among healthy ones like pollock.

"Most of these species coexist with each other and interact with one another, which makes it hard to assess them and maintain the right fishing mortality targets" for all of them, said Bill Gerencer, a seafood buyer for Massachusetts-based M.F. Foley Co.

Then there's the likelihood that the climate is changing, possibly altering assumptions about the population levels the Gulf of Maine can support.

"The impact of global warming is basically to take your historic data and throw it out the window," said Sackton, of Seafood.com. "In New England, we're at the southern range of some very important species like cod. In my opinion, we no longer know where to set our targets."

There may be grounds for optimism. Alden expects that the removal of dams on the Penobscot River -- and the possible opening of fish passages on the St. Croix -- will increase alewives and other forage fish that cod and other species eat.

"This is the start of changes that are happening in the Gulf of Maine that will result in some of the fish coming back," she said. "We have to learn how to take care of them when they do."

Staff Writer Colin Woodard can be contacted at 791-6317 or at:

[email protected]
 

badabing

Banned
Joined
Mar 25, 2012
Posts
38
Likes
3
Location
cape cod
Boat Make
novi
any efforts to replenish ground fish stocks is like pissing in the wind as long as we have this out of control seal population......there is no better way to diminish fish stocks than the gray seal....they eat all available fish and break up spawning aggregations so the fish can't even breed
the talk here on the cape is "gee i wonder where all the striper heads are coming from?' beachgoers are seeing them washed up on all backside beaches, surfers say they see them littering the bottom and the chatham scallop fleet has regularly been catching striper heads in there dredges
i wonder what they eat when the stripers aren't around???
 

duxbait

Captain
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Posts
764
Likes
211
Location
Duxbury MA
I doubt they eat 1.2 million lbs of stripers, and considering most of the quota was taken last year off chatham, they probably were just a small fraction of the fish harvested. Not to mention fish caught recreationally. I am not saying that the seals arn't a problem... They are a fu**ing pain, but humans are the reason for the overfishing.
 

Downeaster

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Posts
229
Likes
15
Location
Jonesport USA
I doubt they eat 1.2 million lbs of stripers, and considering most of the quota was taken last year off chatham, they probably were just a small fraction of the fish harvested. Not to mention fish caught recreationally. I am not saying that the seals arn't a problem... They are a fu**ing pain, but humans are the reason for the overfishing.


Well ... Grey seals area necessary and significant vector in the life cycle of the round worms that so heavily infest the flesh of inshore codfish. I found an FAO paper that explains it far better than I could. Color me in favor of far less grey seals.
 

Pedlyr

Captain
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Posts
532
Likes
177
Location
Southern RI
This is all "More of the same". It all comes from the Sustainable Fisheries Act of the '90's. Basically, everything (fish) has to be at it's historic high level at the same time. In places they have always been.

That can't happen.

My example.... I spent a lot of time dragging in the Great South Channel. For Cod and Blackbacks. One day, we got a big tow of Stripers. No one had ever heard of that. On the beach, they were complaining there were no Stripers around. Of course there weren't. They were Offshore.

Without having to say it, we couldn't catch what Cod was there. So now you have 2 species that are "in decline" or being overfished. Because much of the data ironically is based on landings.
 
Top Bottom